Rarely has anyone so eloquently described ISKCON's past
history and present need for historical self-reflection
as Dr Thomas J. Hopkins in his article 'Why ISKCON Should
Study Its Own History'. An earnest admirer of Srila Prabhupada,
a genuine friend of ISKCON from its beginning, and a scholar
widely honoured for his broad, lucid thinking, Dr Hopkins
here makes a profound and extraordinarily perceptive appeal
to ISKCON to record, comprehend and express historiographically
these crucial early days of a spiritual movement.
As Dr Hopkins notes, 'ISKCON is now in a position to undertake
such an effort and needs to do so while Prabhupada's influence
is still so powerful in living memory'. Dr Hopkins proceeds
to demonstrate how three major religions - Buddhism, Christianity
and Islam - made serious, contemporary efforts to preserve
their early traditions, thus creating the possibility of
critically assessing, at any given point in history, the
extent to which they had stayed on, or strayed from, their
original path and mandate.
Historically, the Vaisnava tradition has distinguished
itself by its vast erudition and brilliant self-expression.
Dr Gary Tubb, then chairman of the Sanskrit and Indian Studies
Department at Harvard, once expressed to me at length his
deep admiration for Rupa Goswami, who had emerged as a
towering intellectual figure in his time through his application
of 'Rasa Theory' to the pastimes of Lord Krsna in such works
as Bhakti-rasamrta-sindhu. Among our forefathers
are such lettered figures as Vyasadeva himself, Jiva Goswami,
Ramanuja, Madhva, Baladeva Vidyabhusana, Bhaktivinoda Thakura,
Bhaktisiddhanta Sarasvati Thakura and of course Srila Prabhupada,
who earned so much heartfelt acclaim from the international
academic community.
ISKCON desperately needs to develop the ability to think
intelligently, critically and historically about itself.
When problems arise, we need to know that these same problems
have manifested many times in the past, both within Vaisnava
history and in the history of other traditions. We need
to know what solutions worked and why, and which attempted
solutions made matters worse and why. ISKCON devotees in
the future will need to know how ISKCON developed, what
really happened, what the problems were, how they were solved
or not solved, and thousands of other issues that will empower
them to serve as wise, experienced stewards of Srila Prabhupada's
movement. It is our grave duty to bequeath to future members
of ISKCON this invaluable resource which only we can provide.
If we don't preserve the history of these days, much of
it will be lost forever.
Most impressively, Dr Hopkins argues that ISKCON should
write its own history: 'This is not a job to leave to outsiders,
although they may provide scholarly advice; it is a family
job, to be done by devotees trained for the task, and conscious
of the movement's needs as well as the obligations of scholarship.
ISKCON's history over the past three decades must be studied
with constant reference to what it could be, and should
be, on the basis of Prabhupada's fundamental principles,
so that strengths can be recognised and built upon, and
mistakes can be corrected before they cause future harm.'
At the same time, Dr Hopkins reminds us that the competent
writing of history requires disciplined training and institutional
support: 'This task awaits devotees who have the historical
training and the institutional support to carry out what
will be even at this early stage of ISKCON's development
a difficult and time-consuming job of collecting the world-wide
data of ISKCON's expansion and evolution, organising it
systematically and trying for the first time to provide
a comprehensive understanding of ISKCON's history.'
Once Srila Prabhupada had established his movement in India,
he constantly consulted with educated friends and well-wishers
regarding the welfare of his society. There can be no question
that Dr Thomas Hopkins has proven himself to be an unusually
supportive and learned friend of ISKCON from its inception.
We must have the maturity to recognise the wisdom of his
words, and, as Srila Prabhupada often said, we must 'do
the needful'.