|
|
|
|
Footnotes and references for
The Perils of Succession: Heresies
of Authority and Continuity In the Hare Krishna Movement
|
|
References
Bhaktivinoda, Kedaranath. 1983. (497 Gourabda) Essay on Nama
Hatta. Sri Sri Godruma Kalpatavi. Sri Mayapur, Nadia, W.
Bengal: Nama Hatta Regional Office
Bromley, David G. & Shinn, Larry D., ed. 1989. Krishna
Consciousness in The West. Toronto: Bucknell University Press
Brooks, Charles R. 1989. The Hare Krishnas in India. Princeton:
Princeton University Press
Daner, Francine Jeanne. 1976. The American Children of Krishna:
A Study of there Krishna Movement. Dallas: Holt, Rinehart,
and Winston
dasa, Badrinarayan, Swami, Giridhari & Swami, Umapati. 1997.
Disciple of My Disciple: An Analysis of the Conversation of
May 28, 1977. Unpublished (March)
dasa, Drutakarma. 1994. Once We Were With Krishna. Unpublished
manuscript
dasa, Hari Sauri. 1992. A Transcendental Diary. 3 vols.
San Diego: HS Books
dasa, Ravindra Svarupa.
1994a. 'Cleaning House and Cleaning Hearts: Reform and Renewal
in ISKCON.' ISKCON Communications Journal, No.3
1994b 'The Next Step In The Expansion of ISKCON: Ending the Fratricidal
War.' Unpublished manuscript (November)
1985a 'Reflections on Brahminical Management.' Unpublished manuscript(June)
1985b 'Under My Order: Reflection on the Guru in ISKCON.' Unpublished
manuscript (August)
1985c 'Serving Srila Prabhupada's Will.' Unpublished manuscript
(September)
dasa, Satyanarayana and Kundali. 1994. In Vaikuntha Not Even
the Leaves Fall. Vrindavana: Jiva Institute of Vaisnava Studies
De, Sushil Kumar. 1961. Early History of the Vaisnava Faith
and Movement in Bengal . Calcutta: Calcutta Oriental Press
Private Ltd
Gelberg, S. J. ed. 1983. Hare Krishna, Hare Krishna. New
York: Grove Press
Goswami, Hridayananda dasa, et al. 1996. Our Original Position.
Stockholm: ISKCON GBC Press
Goswami, Satsvarupa dasa. 1982-3. Srila Prabhupada-lilamrita.
6 vols. Los Angeles: Bhaktivedanta Book Trust
Goswami, Tamal Krishna.
1977. Personal diary, hand-written, (February- November)
1984. Servant of the Servant . Hong Kong: Bhaktivedanta
Book Trust
1996. Book Review: 'Six Myths for Our Times,' ISKCON Communications
Journal 4(1)
Governing Body Commission. 1995. Gurus and Initiation in ISKCON:
Laws of ISKCON. Mayapur: GBC Press
Judah, J. Stillson. 1974. Hare Krishna and the Counterculture.
New York: John Wiley & Sons
Kennedy, Melville T. 1993. The Caitanya Movement: A Study
of Vaishnavism in Bengal. New Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal
Publishers Pvt. Ltd
Levy, Leonard W. 1995. Blasphemy: Verbal Offense Against
the Sacred, from Moses to Salman Rushdie. Chapel Hill: The
University of North Carolina Press
Pagels, Elaine. 1996. The Origin of Satan. New York: Vintage
Books
Prabhupada, A. C. Bhaktivedanta.
1970. 'Direction of Management.' July 28, 1970. Unpublished
1974, 5. Sri Chaitanya-charitamrita, 17 Vols. Los Angeles:
Bhaktivedanta Book Trust
1986. Bhagavad-gita As It Is . Australia: Bhaktivedanta
Book Trust
1987. Letters From Srila Prabhupada, 5 Vols. Culver City:
The Vaishnava Institute
1987. Srimad-Bhagavatam. 12 cantos. Singapore: Bhaktivedanta
Book Trust
1990. Conversations With Srila Prabhupada. Los Angeles:
Bhaktivedanta Book Trust
Rochford, E. B. Jr.
1985. Hare Krishna In America. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers
University Press
1997.'Leader Misconduct, Religious Authority, and the Development
of the Hare Krishna Movement,' in Anson Shupe, editor, Wolves
Among the Fold. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press
Shinn, L. D. 1987. The Dark Lord: Cult Images and The Hare
Krishnas In America. Philadelphia: The Westminster Press
Swami, Jayadvaita.
1996a. Where the Ritvik People Are Right. Unpublished (January)
1996b Where the Ritvik People Are Wrong. Unpublished (January)
Tyson, Joseph B. 1984. The New Testament and Early Christianity.
New York: MacMillan Publishing Company
Footnotes
- Bhaktivinoda Thakura described the organisation
of Sri Nama-Hatta in theological as well as practical terms. (See
Bhaktivinoda 1983)
- Spoken to this writer while returning by car
from a morning walk at Cheviot Hills, Los Angeles, in July 1975.
'Ten thousand years' refers to the belief that the advent of Sri
Caitanya inaugurates a golden age lasting ten thousand years within
the normally dark age of Kali.
- Shinn believes succession was not the issue:
'The burning issue for ISKCON in the aftermath of Prabhupada's
death was not that of succession: it was a traditional disciplic
line which his own designates and gurus appointed later could
fit. Rather, the problem was how his personal authority to interpret
scriptures, to decide future courses of action for the society,
and to solve personal and institutional problems could or would
be institutionalised.' (Shinn, 1987 p.50) Ravindra Svarupa agrees
with Shinn if 'succession' merely refers to initiating new disciples
(though some ISKCON members found this a particularly contentious
issue). The Bhagavad-gita (4:1-4) clearly mentions the
principle of disciplic succession, and Prabhupada affirmed this
fundamental concept throughout his teachings. But if 'successor'
is understood as the spiritual head of an institution, this was
precisely the issue that threatened to divide ISKCON after Prabhupada's
demise.
- From the author's personal diary (hand-written),
October 31, 1977. The two supporters were Shriman Narayan, the
former Governor of Gujarat and the industrialist Ram Krishna Bajaj.
- See Sri Caitanya-caritamrita, Madhya-lila
7.128 (Prabhupada1975).
- The first GBC had twelve members, all initiated
male disciples and all but one married. The present GBC numbers
twenty-eight, still all males, but now predominantly sannyasis
(renunciates).
- The sikha is kept by the Vaishnavas when
they shave their heads, which distinguishes them from Buddhists
and impersonalists of the Shankara School.
- Same letter to Brahmananda as in preceding
citation.
- The spitting incident took place in October
1967. Prabhupada considered his other disciples' response 'regrettable,'
and ordered that they send a letter of regret and apology for
their mistake. He made it clear that he had only ordered that
Kirtananda not be permitted to speak; he had never banned him
from the temple.
- Kirtananda Swami's disregard of authority eventually
proved his undoing, ending in his expulsion from ISKCON in 1987.
- For a discussion of demonisation of heretics,
see E. Pagels' The Origin of Satan.
- During the period of June-August, 1969, the
author was thrice handed scraps of paper by the guru's secretary,
each bearing lists of disciples under the heading 'G. B.,' an
abbreviation for Governing Body. At the time we naively speculated
that these 'G.B.' scraps were in fact predestinarian lists of
the elect, Going Back to Godhead.
- For a detailed discussion of the meanings of
the term acarya, see letter from Pradyumna dasa to Satsvarupa
Maharaja dated 7th August, 1978 (dasa, R. S. 1985b).
- It is clear from this letter that Prabhupada expected the GBC to
conduct its affairs constitutionally, though at the time no rules
of order were followed in any meetings. Shortly after this incident,
a modified version of 'Robert's Rules of Order' was introduced
and, over the years, tailored to fit ISKCON's ecclesiastic needs.
- Transcriptions of the 'appointment tapes' of
28, May 1977 and 8, July 1977 as well as the secretary's letter
to the society, may be found in the appendix to Hare Krishna
in America (see Rochford 1991:283-6). Varied interpretations
of these tapes became the basis for a heated debate concerning
whether Prabhupada intended for those he named to become regular
gurus and accept their own disciples after his demise, or whether
Prabhupada would continue to accept the new disciples even after
his death (See 'The Ritvik acarya Heresy').
- (See: Rochford Table 9.1 'The Reasons for Spiritual
Crises of ISKCON Members.') While many other reasons are given
for their leaving, a major cause was the concerns expressed in
Pradyumna's letter.
- Some ISKCON leaders were quick to demonise
Sridhara Maharaja, especially when he began to re-initiate disciples
of ISKCON gurus. After many years of virtually no official contact,
the GBC sent a representation to the elderly Vaishnava shortly
before he passed away to apologise for any offences they had committed.
- The 1987 meetings lasted more than three weeks
owing to a suspension of normal rules while each GBC member (other
than those newly elected) submitted himself for evaluation and
correction by a fifty-person committee. Not all of the original
gurus could commit themselves to the changes demanded. During
the previous year three were victimised by sensual fall-downs
and left ISKCON in disgrace, perhaps discouraged by their loss
of prestige and influence, or simply weakened by the years of
extravagance. A fourth, Kirtananda Swami, was excommunicated along
with his followers for failing to submit to the new changes. The
GBC was down to fifteen. The new additions brought it up to strength
again.
Excommunication in ISKCON generally carries with it a proviso
for re-instatement when certain conditions are met. The excommunicated
member is not permitted to participate in ISKCON activities. Yet
the examination order does not imply that the severed member cannot
make advancement spiritually by practising Krishna Consciousness
on his own, though it is thought that his progress will be hindered
without the association afforded through the society. After his
excommunication, Kirtananda experimented with inter-faith practices,
incorporating many Christian influences into Vaishnava worship
procedures. As these changes took place following his and the
community's disassociation form ISKCON, the GBC did not concern
itself with these matters. Hence, these experiments do not fall
within domain of this paper.
- At present, the number of gurus has expanded
to nearly 100. There were other changes to insure Prabhupada's
central position: a permanent seat in each temple alone would
honour him, and no other guru would be allowed the public use
of the title acarya.
- During the first of the 'appointment' meetings
of 1977 Prabhupada told this author with regard to ISKCON leadership,
' No one of you alone but all of you together.'
- Letter addressed to the present writer
dated 11, November 1996.
- The recent official GBC paper entitled
'Disciple of My Disciple' (see, dasa, B., et. al. 1997)
is largely concerned with demonstrating that this theory is more
correctly a proxy-initiation theory. Included in the paper is
the research of GBC member and Sanskritist Hridayananda dasa Goswami:
'The significant point here is that terms such as ritvik-guru
and ritvik-acarya simply do not exist. There is no
such term in any Sanskrit dictionary, nor in any recognised Vedic
literature, to my knowledge. There is no such term because there
is no such concept. In other words, our friends are proposing
something that does not exist in Vedic culture. This is the main
problem with it.' To avoid the unnecessary confusion which would
arise were we to refer to the same debate in two dissimilar ways,
we will use 'proxy-initiation' to describe the issue.
- GBC Resolution No. 203.2 of 1996.
- In 1996, two more gurus renounced their disciples,
expressing inability to maintain their vows. One was the highly
respected retired GBC Minister of Education. Their resignation
adds fresh fuel to the proxy-initiation debate.
- Letter dated 9, July 1977, unpublished.
- The first brahminical initiations were held
in Boston in August 1968, the second in San Francisco in September
of the same year.
- Standards for awarding brahminical initiation
have gradually tightened over the years, though temples which
experience a shortage of priests, may be more lenient in recommending
a candidate for initiation.
- We may wish to recall that Prabhupada's original
GBC included no sannyasis. His 'Direction of Management'
specifies their duties: 'The sannyasi will travel to our
different centres for preaching purposes as well as enlightening
the members of the centre for spiritual advancement. The sannyasis
will suggest for opening new centres in suitable places and
the GBC will take action on it.' (Prabhupada 1970) Prabhupada
initially envisioned a different role for the sannyasis, but managerial
necessity dictated otherwise.
- For a Buddhist version of this story, see 'Muddy
Road,' in Paul Reps, ed. Zen Flesh, Zen Bones: A Collection
of Zen and Pre-Zen Writings. (Doubleday Company, NY: N.D.)
p.18.
- This is a translation of a text from
the Sri Caitanya-caritamrita, Madhya-lila 8.128.
- Prabhupada wanted to be certain that he had
uprooted any remnant of the grihastha-sannyasi conflict.
As the leader of the principal sannyasi party, this writer
was called to his room and ordered to leave the party and go to
preach in the Orient. Having just been elected Chairman of the
GBC, this writer thought it would be better to send a non-GBC
member away. 'Why not GBC?' Prabhupada demanded. 'All your resolutions
are finished. First resolution, then revolution, then dissolution
- no solution! I have to manage everything myself! I give you
a little power, and you create havoc! GBC is for solving situations,
not for creating situations... Now I take everything from you.
You can either go, or you simply sit here in Mayapur and chant!'
(dasa, H. 1992: vol. I: 458). My excuses shattered, I bowed my
head, conceding to my guru's desire. (Prabhupada may have resolved
the immediate conflict but gender bias continues to haunt ISKCON-see
'Concluding Remarks.')
- Rasika-bhakti refers to devotion guided
by rasa, or taste. It is used here in the context of spontaneous
devotion (raganuga-bhakti) as opposed to devotion generated
from following rules (vaidhi-bhakti).
- While the impact of Narayana Maharaja on devotees
residing within the ISKCON temples is minimal, he has created
a significant following among independent devotees not under any
direct ISKCON authority. His visit to Australia attracted many
persons who no longer felt inspired by the ISKCON leadership.
The fact that ISKCON is bracing itself in anticipation of his
next world tour indicates that ISKCON is both concerned and affected
by what goes on in the wider circle of devotees residing outside
its immediate temple communities.
- GBC Resolution 79 of 1995. See, Goswami, H.
d., 1996:186-7.
- This policy has forced the GBC to select less
suitable candidates for particular assignments, often with dire
consequences.
- This is not the first time the GBC has attempted
to add a secondary body of assistants. The previous experiment
some 10 years ago was quickly abandoned. But senior devotees are
ageing, and this along with their increased responsibilities may
guarantee these new deputies' continued participation. In addition,
a grand-disciple of Prabhupada was selected as an 'assistant'
GBC, a preliminary appointment that usually leads to full-fledged
GBC status.
Back to Part One
Back to Part Two
|
Print
this page |
|