|
Sefton
Davies
Jesus, Ghandi, Luther, Churchill, Hitler. all great leaders who helped change
the course of history. What did they do? Why were they able to do it when others
had failed? Can leadership be learned or is it inherent? These are important
questions for any organisation, because leadership can enable organisations
to achieve results beyond normal expectations. In this article, Sefton Davies
analyses the nature of and qualities of organisational leadership.
While Mikhail Gorbachev was on holiday at his Black Sea datcha in August 1991,
a military cabal seized power and declared martial law.Tanks and troops patrolled
the streets of Moscow and assemblies of people were forbidden under pain of
death. Yet in front of the television cameras which beamed pictures around the
globe, a man climbed onto one of the tanks and read out his defiance of the
coup and his proposals for re-establishing democratic government. That evening,
many thousands of Moscow citizens thronged the streets and the coup collapsed.
This act of defiance by Boris Yeltsin was one of the most dramatic acts of leadership
I can recall. Why?
- Because he knew which way he wanted to go: he had a vision
- Because he believed it was for the good of his nation to go
in that direction
- Because he had the courage to express his vision at risk of
personal danger
- Because he was able to express his vision so that others could
understand it and believe in it
- Because others shared his vision and were prepared to follow
him, even at personal cost
- Because the vision was capable of being translated into meaningful
action
I am not saying that Boris Yeltsin's vision was necessarily the right one for
Russia or that he has been successful in implementing it through effective management;
only that he was able to persuade many members of his organisation (Russia)
to follow him. It does, however, provide a working definition of leadership:
knowing where to go and getting others to follow, even in the face of opposition.
It is important to realise that leadership has no moral dimension ―
Hitler knew where to go and showed tremendous power in leading the German people
to that goal, but few would now believe he was morally justified. This does
not mean that he was not a good leader but rather his vision was not morally
acceptable to the majority of people. Equally, leadership does not necessarily
achieve its ends, since the skills needed to manage long-term success are sometimes
different from the qualities of inspirational leadership; for example, Boris
Yeltsin's leadership does not have the same appeal now as it did in August 1991.
However, it is true that a leader will only be successful as long as his followers
share the same vision, regardless of its moral validity to others, and as long
as they continue to follow. What, then, are the factors which will achieve
this end?
1. The vision must be clear to the leader
A vision is an appreciation of what total success in any venture will look
like. It requires a clear understanding of what, within a prescribed period,
is the ultimate goal which will give complete satisfaction to all members of
the organisation. Although this is frequently presented as being something magical
― Martin Luther King's 'I have a dream ... ' ― it is, in fact,
a logical projection into the future based on evidence from the past and the
present. This sounds simple, but is often difficult to achieve because most
of us are unable to escape from present habits and thought patterns, and are
often frightened of the changes necessary to keep an organisation dynamic; we
therefore tend to find it difficult to envisage the ideal goal. It is, however,
possible to train oneself to do this through a process called 'visioning. You
can do it yourself now by following the instructions in the exercise below.
It will be most effective if you seek the help of a colleague to read out the
instructions, pausing after each phrase in italics to allow you to form the
image, sounds, etc.
Close your eyes and create in your mind a picture of your organisation
as it is now. See it in all its detail ― the place, its contents,
the people, etc. See it in colour. Move through it so that you
see it in all its dimensions. Now focus on the sounds of the place ―
the ambient sounds, the sounds of people. Turn up the sound so that it
is really loud and all around you. Now feel the place. Feel the physical
presence ― temperature, air movement, surfaces, etc. Then your emotional
feelings about the place ― your joys, your fears, your dislikes, etc.
Intensify them. Finally, any smells or tastes associated with the organisation.
Open your eyes and look around you.
Close your eyes again. Now create a picture of your ideal organisation.
See it in all its detail ― the place, its contents, the people,
etc. See it in colour. Move through it so that you see it in all
its dimensions. Now focus on the sounds of the place and the people.
Turn up the sound so that it is really loud and all around you.
Now feel the place ―temperature, air, surfaces and objects.
Then your emotional feelings about the place ― your joys,
fears, etc. Intensify them. Finally, any smells or tastes associated
with the organisation.
When you have complete both 'visions'
- describe to your colleague what each vision was like
- identify the main differences between the two visions and select
the most important for you
- identify the activities which will lead you from the present
vision to the ideal one
- decide whether you really want the ideal vision, or does it
have undesirable consequences for you or others
Was your second, ideal, vision very different from the first? If not, you really
have nowhere to lead ― be happy that you have a near perfect organisation!
If there were large differences, then you have something to tell your colleagues.
Did you find there were reasons why you would not accept your ideal organisation?
Was it because you were frightened by it? Did it offend your values? Or would
it cause inconvenience for some of your colleagues? How valid are your concerns
in relation to the advantages for the organisation? Great leaders do not promise
an easy passage to their vision !
The ability to see clearly the direction in which an organisation needs
to go is not, however, possessed by everyone in authority although, with practice,
'visioning' becomes easier, more effective and it is possible to improve one's
capacity for farsightedness. The use of 'lateral thinking', which can
also be improved with practice, also enables new dimensions of creative leadership
to be explored; for example,consider the possibilities which may present themselves
if you were to reverse your present thinking and behaviour. However, the reality
is that not everyone is equally endowed with vision or the capacity to develop
it, yet many such people are in the position of appointed leader. In such cases,
wisdom demands the use of the talents of others to provide the visionary aspects
of leadership: to accept de facto leadership in their subordinates and to use
their own authority to support and enable the vision to be achieved through
effective management. This process of allowing leadership to be exercised by
the most gifted person in any given situation is known as contingency leadership.
The role of contingent leader may be exercised by several members of an
organisation over time, depending on changing circumstances and problems, but
there is a continuing need for effective management. There is, therefore, a
distinction to be made between leadership and management, and a good
manager will recognise and use this distinction by encouraging leadership qualities
in subordinates while coordinating the efforts of the whole organisational team.
2. The leader must be able to
communicate the vision
A distinguishing quality of good leaders is their ability to inspire others
with the desire to achieve their mission, and good communication is therefore
an essential quality of leadership. To be effective, it needs to convey to followers:
Commitment: Followers must be convinced that
the leader has a deep, even passionate, belief in the rightness
of the direction in which (s)he is going, and that the benefits
of following that route will be shared by everyone, not just the
leader. To be a good leader means, therefore, that the vision is
not some ephemeral phenomenon, but is a carefully thought through
plan which will satisfy the needs of the organisation and which
conforms to the values, beliefs and aspirations of its members.
It means also that the leader is seen to be willing to devote his
or her own energies to the task and not merely expect others to
make the necessary effort. Ghandi's 'death-fasts' and imprisonments
were a graphic demonstration of his belief in his cause. You might
try exploring your own commitment by seeking the help of a colleague
to ask you why you are acting as leader and, in response to your
answer, to again ask why, and to keep on asking you to justify your
response until you reach the core of your motivation.
Simplicity: Complicated, wordy and theoretical
messages have little impact compared with concise, snappy statements.
This is the power of catch phrases such as 'I have a dream ... '
(Martin Luther King), 'The new frontier' (John F. Kennedy) or 'New
deal'(Franklin D. Roosevelt). Visions are clear and uncluttered,
so the enunciation or them must be equally simple. Good leaders
trim their message to the bare essentials and encapsulate it in
memorable phrases.
Excitement: Followers must feel energised by
the vision and motivated to work for its realisation, and this can
only be done if it excites them because of its worthiness. Hitler's
promise of a renewed, greater Germany, Martin Luther King's dream
of a free and just America, John F. Kennedy's call for a new frontier
all gave colour and excitement to their visions. While most organisational
visions are not of this calibre, they must, nevertheless, imbue
followers with the determination to achieve success.
3. The leader must motivate followers
After the initial excitement generated by acceptance of the leader's
vision for the organisation, followers will need to be motivated
to continue working for its realisation, and this is the leader's
responsibility. Motivation comes from receiving a return from effort
made, in the form of job satisfaction. The wise leader will, therefore,
ensure that
- colleagues are involved in the determination of policy and
are free to comment on and discuss all aspects of organisational
management
- followers receive regular feedback and appreciation of effort
made
- work is made challenging, through delegation of true responsibility
and trust shown through the granting of full authority to exercise
responsibility [i]
- a conducive working environment is maintained through effective
team management [ii] and good social interaction
- problems, both professional and personal, are dealt with in
a caring manner
4. The leadership style must instill faith
in the leader
Followers will follow only as long as they have confidence in the vision and
the leader's ability to achieve it. When this confidence dissipates, allegiance
will be transferred to a new leader, with probably a new vision. To maintain
confidence, the leader must display personal qualities which instil trust, such
as:
Courage: Great leaders have the courage which
comes from belief in their vision and the willingness to sacrifice
their own comfort to achieve it. This can often mean physical courage,
but in the organisational sense it usually means willingness to
face opposition, to be truthful, to admit mistakes, to listen to
subordinates without fearing loss of authority and the willingness
to take calculated risks in the interests of the organisation. Such
courage can only come from clarity of vision and personal confidence
arising from self-awareness and strong self-esteem, both of which
are within the control of the individual. The notion of charisma,
which is often used to describe leaders, is very dubious unless
one can identify and learn its underlying behaviour. Although many
leaders do become adopt such behaviour at a very early age, until
is becomes almost intuitive, it is also possible to learn confidence
at any age through techniques used in Transactional Analysis, Assertiveness
Training, Neuro-Linguist Programming, [iii] , etc.
Competence: This largely results through total
belief in the rightness of the vision and its capability of achievement,
but also comes from a full understanding of its implications. A
leader must therefore be seen to have the knowledge and skills to
manage success. Good leaders need to be good managers or, at least,
to have the help of good managers who can ensure that dreams are
translated into reality. Followers will look for early signs of
wise decisions and effective systems for implementing them, and
will soon tire of idealistic dreaming which achieves no practical
benefits for them and the organisation.
Decisiveness: There is nothing more debilitating
for an organisation than leaders and managers who cannot make decisions
or get things done. Decision-making is not some magical process,
but a systematic analysis of a problem, the possession of all relevant
data concerning that problem, the awareness of the options available
for solving it, the courage to decide between these options and
the confidence to apply the solution rigorously while maintaining
the flexibility to modify the strategy in the event of changing
circumstances. One of the greatest dangers to a leader is unwillingness
to act; the old Native American saying,'The quickest way to cross
a lake is to cross the lake' is forgotten, and time and energy is
spent on talking about how to cross the lake leading to the curse
of 'paralysis by analysis'. Wise leaders will use all the intelligence
and creativity of their colleagues in analysing problems and generating
solutions, but will have the courage make and implement the final
decision themselves.
Togetherness: Leaders need to be of the people,
not remote figures, shaping their followers into effective and dedicated
teams. Sharing the work, being visible, showing concern for followers'
anxieties and caring for those who have problems, will all help
bind the team and create trust in the leader.
Impartiality: A leader must be above the petty
quarrels and conflicts which afflict most organisations; this will
necessitate a level of detachment from the day-to-day minutia and
instead overseeing the overall implementation of policy, although
this must not be construed as a remoteness from people.
What practical lessons can be learned from this analysis of leadership qualities?
To be a good leader you will need to:
- Clarify your vision of where your organisation needs to go in
order to be ideal. Make it simple and graphic so that others will
be moved by and understand it.
- Use effective communications: If you are not a good communicator,
learn to be one. Seek feedback on how you come across to others,
and modify your behaviour. Learn to avoid wordiness, pedantry,
nit-picking and dullness.
- Use the leadership of others. There will be times when others
may see more clearly than yourself which direction is needed to
advance the vision; utilise their skills until you are back on
course. Do not be afraid to acknowledge the talents of others.
- Translate your vision into practical management. The vision
will not achieve itself - it needs to be worked towards through
practical planning. If you are not a particularly practical and
methodical person, delegate responsibility and authority for achieving
the vision to someone who shares your dream and is good at managing
people and resources.
- Model high standards. Your own behaviour as leader will establish
the standards expected of your followers. You will need to be
seen to be demonstrating the standards of effort, probity, courage
and fairness needed to translate the vision into reality.
- Lead - don't drive. People will gladly follow someone who knows
where to go, but resent being prodded from behind. If your vision
is a good one and people trust you to lead them, they will work
towards it without the need for supervision. Seek their active
participation in decision-making and use all the creativity of
your team.
- Motivate your followers by maintaining a challenging, participative
and rewarding management environment.
- Be prepared to take risks in pursuit of your vision. Ensure,
however, that you have fully explored the consequences of your
intended actions, and involve your colleagues in deciding the
worthiness of your decisions.
- Have the courage of your convictions. If your vision is worthwhile,
it will justify any sacrifices that may be perhaps be required
in terms of time, effort and personal comfort. There is a story
of a monk who, refusing to deny his faith under pain of death,
was brought before the Emperor who said, 'Do you realise who I
am? I am the man who could drive a sword through you without turning
a hair.' The monk looked him in the eye and said, 'And do you
realise who I am? I am the man you could drive a sword through
and who wouldn't turn a hair.'
[i] See 'Delegation: the key to effective management',
Sefton Davies in ISKCON Communications Journal, Issue No. 4, July-December
1994.
[ii] See 'Teamwork is the essence of organisational
effectiveness', Sefton Davies in ISKCON Communications Journal, Issue
No. 3, January-June 1994 .
[iii] For information on these, the reader needs to
read further, e.g.: Magic Demystified, Lewis & Pucelik (for N.L.P.);
T.A. Today, I. Stewart & V. Joines (for Transaction Analysis); Assertiveness
at Work, K. & K. Back; The Inner Game of Management, E. Flamholtz
& Y. Randle.
< Back · Top
^ |
|